Re: Rule for updating through a view.

In <3E7F2C01(dot)E012A174(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de>, Christoph Haller <ch(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de> typed:
> Is it this what you've found and can't get to work?

Yes, that was what I found. I was having trouble figuring out how it
*should* work. I think I've got it now - the missing idea was that the
new and old rows contain the *entire* rows, not just what was being
updated. That makes it possible to pull values from them and udpate
entire rows in the table(s) the view joins. At least, that's the way I
believe it should work. My views don't have enough information to
identify a unique row in those tables, so I can't do this safely
anyway.

Thanks,
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm(at)mired(dot)org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.