| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 6.8.5: Location of CURRENT_DATE unclear |
| Date: | 2003-04-12 04:16:18 |
| Message-ID: | 15987.1050120978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The latter, as you could easily have found by experiment.
> In fact, I did find that out by experiment. My real question, I guess,
> is "is there some good reason not to have this information in the
> documentation?" (In fact, I'm sure the answer is "no,"
Certainly.
> so more the real
> question is, "Is my whinging enough to get someone to add it, or do I
> have to get off my lazy ass and submit a patch?")
If you submit a doc patch, it'll get done ;-).
Seriously, the docs are all too much written by people who already knew
the answers. I like doc patches from people who found something out the
hard way, because they tend to put the info where they expected to find
it --- which isn't necessarily where the original developer thought to
document it, but *is* likely to be where other users would look.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Reifschneider | 2003-04-13 23:43:49 | Docs patch to note that rules only get run once per query. |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-04-12 03:42:09 | Re: 6.8.5: Location of CURRENT_DATE unclear |