RE: bug in psql?

From: "Aleksey M Boltenkov" <holybolt(at)rambler(dot)ru>
To: holybolt(at)rambler(dot)ru
Cc: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: RE: bug in psql?
Date: 2020-08-15 06:51:53
Message-ID: 1597474313.828133.30766.37520@mail.rambler.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

15.08.2020, 09:46, Aleksey M Boltenkov <holybolt(at)rambler(dot)ru>

15.08.2020, 08:56, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>"Aleksey M Boltenkov" <holybolt(at)rambler(dot)ru>
writes:
> Is this a bug?

> pg01:5432 postgres(at)db=# select 'any expression'any expression\d+;

No. The "\d+;" is taken as a backslash command, and is executed.
The rest of what you typed is still waiting in the query buffer.

It's bit weird perhaps, since \d seems like a "do-something"
command rather than a query buffer editing command. But
psql uses the same rules for both cases.

regards, tom lane

Yes, i have used it for a long, but it was always wellformed, so malformed
query was some kind of surprise.
select format('insert into x.y ( field, ... ) select val, ... from %I.%I on
conflict ( constraint ) do nothing;\dti+ x.y*', (regexp_match(tablename,
'\d[\d_]+$'))[1], schemaname, tablename) from pg_tables where schemaname =
'x' and tablename ~ '^y' order by 1;
insert into x.y ( field, ... ) select '2020_07_29'::date, field, ... from
x.y_archive_2020_07_29 on conflict ( constraint ) do nothing;\dti+
x.y_new_scheme*
insert into x.y ( field, ... ) select '2020_08_05'::date, field, ... from
x.y_archive_2020_08_05 on conflict ( constraint ) do nothing;\dti+
x.y_new_scheme*
insert into x.y ( field, ... ) select '2020_08_12'::date, field, ... from
x.y_archive_2020_08_12 on conflict ( constraint ) do nothing;\dti+
x.y_new_scheme*
\gexec

Aleksey M Boltenkov.

Sorry, \gexec does not work, copy and paste.
Aleksey M Boltenkov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksey M Boltenkov 2020-08-15 06:54:26 RE: bug in psql?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-08-15 06:49:13 Re: bug in psql?