Re: Fractal tree indexing

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fractal tree indexing
Date: 2013-02-13 14:49:39
Message-ID: 1592C954-0BA7-41E5-AD68-7DB08F896021@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>
>
> If they are patented as Alexander says upthread, then surely the idea is dead in the water.
>
>
True, I think so too.

But,the generic WAL seems an awesome idea and I would love to help.

Atri

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-02-13 14:50:12 Re: Fractal tree indexing
Previous Message David Fetter 2013-02-13 14:45:31 FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]