Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-02-02 23:10:49
Message-ID: 1590310.1675379449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It's still important to have libc support as an option, though,
> because it's a totally reasonable thing to want sort order to agree
> with the "sort" command on the same host, and you are willing to deal
> with all the complexities that we're trying to escape.

Yeah. I would be resistant to making ICU a required dependency,
but it doesn't seem unreasonable to start moving towards it being
our default collation support.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-02 23:12:46 Re: Remove unused code related to unknown type
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-02-02 22:48:05 Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?