| From: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Cc: | lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk | 
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but not use... | 
| Date: | 2003-01-09 14:14:21 | 
| Message-ID: | 15901.33725.431183.286372@kelvin.csl.co.uk | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches | 
Guys, just posted patches for libpq to address thread-safe issues. Now
uses strerror_r(), gethostbyname_r(), getpwuid_r() and crypt_r() where
available. Passes all tests on Linux and Solaris.
Any comments let me know - my first major(ish) outing in the
PostgreSQL source, in particular I'm not use in the configure stuff is
100% right...
Patches also at:
 http://services.csl.co.uk/postgresql/diffs-20030109-configure.txt.gz
 http://services.csl.co.uk/postgresql/diffs-20030109-libpq.txt.gz
Thanks, Lee.
Lee Kindness writes:
 > Tom Lane writes:
 >  > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
 >  > > We have definatly had requests for improved thread-safeness for libpq
 >  > > and ecpg in the past, so whatever you can do would be a help.  We say
 >  > > libpq is thread-safe, but specifically mention the non-threadsafe calls
 >  > > in the libpq documentation, or at least we should.
 >  > We do:
 >  > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/libpq-threading.html
 >  > But Lee's point about depending on possibly-unsafe libc routines is a
 >  > good one.  I don't think anyone's gone through the code with an eye to
 >  > that.
 > 
 > Right, so a reasonable angle for me to take is to go through the libpq
 > source looking for potential problem areas and use of "known bad"
 > functions. I can add autoconf checks for the replacement *_r()
 > functions, and use these in place of the traditional ones where
 > available.
 > 
 > If any function is found to be not thread-safe and cannot be made so
 > using standard library calls then it needs to be documented as such
 > both in the source and the aforementioned documentation.
 > 
 > This approach avoids any thread library dependencies and documents the
 > current state of play WRT thread safety (i.e it's a good, and needed,
 > basis for any later work).
 > 
 > ECPG is a separate issue, and best handled as such (it will need
 > thread calls). I'll post a patch for it at a later date so the changes
 > are available to anyone who wants to play with ECPG and threads.
 > 
 > Ta, Lee.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-01-09 14:15:34 | Re: psql and readline | 
| Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2003-01-09 14:08:51 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but not use... | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-09 15:04:14 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but not use... | 
| Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2003-01-09 14:08:51 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but not use... |