| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: user connection not recorded? |
| Date: | 2015-07-30 15:40:20 |
| Message-ID: | 15901.1438270820@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> Alright, but the part that has me confused is this comment in the code:
> * In standalone mode and in autovacuum worker processes, we use a fixed
> * ID, otherwise we figure it out from the authenticated user name.
> and this
> else if (IsBackgroundWorker)
> I read the above to mean background processes also follow that path.
Yeah, I suppose so, since they don't really have a username to use.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Keirse | 2015-07-30 15:41:11 | Re: Transaction ID Wraparound Monitoring |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-07-30 14:58:32 | Re: user connection not recorded? |