Re: ALTER TABLE schema SCHEMA TO new_schema?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE schema SCHEMA TO new_schema?
Date: 2002-12-01 05:47:53
Message-ID: 15899.1038721673@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Someone asked earlier about how to change a bunch of existing tables int the
> PUBLIC schema to some other schema. For grins I tried:
> regression=# update pg_class set relnamespace=556829 where relname = 'foo' and
> relnamespace=2200;
> UPDATE 1

> and it seemed to work fine (i.e. moved foo from schema public to schema bar).

But it didn't fix the pg_depend entries linking the table to its schema :-(

> But it made me wonder if we shouldn't have:
> ALTER TABLE table SCHEMA TO new_schema

I was thinking more along the lines of ALTER TABLE a.b RENAME TO x.y

I don't see anything in the SQL spec about this; anyone know what
precedent is in Oracle or other DBMSes?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-01 05:55:14 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-12-01 05:32:22 Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3