Re: pg_restore -L reordering of the statements does not work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aditya D <dsaditya91(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore -L reordering of the statements does not work
Date: 2023-10-27 18:34:46
Message-ID: 1589825.1698431686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Aditya D <dsaditya91(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Problem Statement - The ACL command i.e. The grant statement gets called
> out at the end while performing pg_restore and the use case is to call it
> at the beginning. I believe even though the re-ordering is done the
> statements are executed using the "Internal Archive Id" while referring
> to the dump file.

Yeah, see the comments for RestorePass:

* For historical reasons, ACL items are interspersed with everything else in
* a dump file's TOC; typically they're right after the object they're for.
* However, we need to restore data before ACLs, as otherwise a read-only
* table (ie one where the owner has revoked her own INSERT privilege) causes
* data restore failures. On the other hand, matview REFRESH commands should
* come out after ACLs, as otherwise non-superuser-owned matviews might not
* be able to execute. (If the permissions at the time of dumping would not
* allow a REFRESH, too bad; we won't fix that for you.) We also want event
* triggers to be restored after ACLs, so that they can't mess those up.
*
* These considerations force us to make three passes over the TOC,
* restoring the appropriate subset of items in each pass. We assume that
* the dependency sort resulted in an appropriate ordering of items within
* each subset.

Use of an -L switch overrides the dependency sort, but not this
pass mechanism.

Whatever you're hoping to do by overriding that is most likely
just going to replace one kind of breakage by another.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message M Sarwar 2023-10-27 19:32:47 RE: ORDER BY DESC and NULLS LAST by default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-27 18:08:19 Re: ORDER BY DESC and NULLS LAST by default