From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Temporary views |
Date: | 2004-02-11 06:28:28 |
Message-ID: | 15891.1076480908@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:10:29AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So this is doable with just a Small Matter of Programming to pass the
>> is-temp flag through from the grammar to wherever the object gets
>> created.
>> ...
>> Whether it's worth the trouble is another question. What's the
>> use-case?
> [ example snipped ]
> Essentially I'm using views for macro expansion.
> Think it's worth it?
If you want to submit a patch I won't stand in your way. How bad is
your itch?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kdyke | 2004-02-11 06:55:35 | Re: book for postgresql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-11 06:17:04 | Re: DB cache size strategies |