From: | Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Continuent (was: Postgres Clustering) |
Date: | 2009-05-29 00:26:32 |
Message-ID: | 15890762.21243556788315.JavaMail.flavio@presente |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
----- "Alan McKay" <alan(dot)mckay(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
> Hmmm. Anyone out there have the Continuent solution working with PostgreSQL?
> If so, what release? We're at 8.3 right now.
I have tested Sequoia 2.10.10 with a high transaction rate database with good servers and plenty of memory. Since that's a OLTP system the performance droped to as low as 30%.
I can't recomend their solution for a OLAP system because I never tested in this situation.
Configuration of Sequoia is quite complicated and I think a very good Database Administrator is needed to keep it working correctly and nodes syncronized.
Sequoia also is very complicated to run ddl and dml scripts since your scrips should be written for Sequoia, not for PostgreSQL.
If log-shipping works for you, try Slony. Your slaves can serve as read-only databases and you can distribute some load.
Flavio
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2009-05-29 00:36:10 | Debugging pgsql function date error |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2009-05-29 00:19:08 | Re: Pl/java in 8.4 bet1 sources compilation failed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel | 2009-05-29 00:35:12 | Re: Scalability in postgres |
Previous Message | Anne Rosset | 2009-05-28 22:46:43 | Unexpected query plan results |