| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Date: | 2018-09-03 13:51:40 |
| Message-ID: | 15890.1535982700@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> AFAICS, this problem exists in 9.6 and prior branches as well,
> although, I can't test it. I am not sure whether we need to backpatch
> this beyond 10 (where hash indexes are WAL logged) as prior to that
> hash-indexes are anyway not-reliable. What's your opinion?
Presumably, any patch for pre-10 would look completely different
as the hash index code was quite different. I can't see that it's
worth the development time to do something there, especially if
you lack an easy way to test.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-09-03 14:06:17 | Re: TR: pgadmin not displaying data from postgresql_fdw |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2018-09-03 13:06:18 | Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) |