From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
Date: | 2020-09-24 04:06:31 |
Message-ID: | 1588493.1600920391@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 06:26:49PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> The attached patch is Tom's patch from this thread from March last
>> year minus his regression test changes plus my join surcharge stuff.
>> This is just intended as a topic of conversation at the moment and
>> does not make any adjustments to the expected test outputs.
> So, this patch has been moved across 7 successive CFs already. Tom,
> you are registered as a reviewer of this patch. Do we have any plans
> to move this forward? Or, as this thread is now idle for months,
> should it be just RwF or such?
Well, there's a real problem here, but the patch is not pretending
to be committable -- as David says, it's more a starting point for
investigation. It's fair to say that this isn't the sort of material
that should be on the CF list. We don't have a good way to keep
track of "problems that should be investigated" :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 04:11:36 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 03:34:07 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 04:11:36 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 04:01:49 | Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process |