| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search |
| Date: | 2013-12-05 15:34:16 |
| Message-ID: | 15883.1386257656@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I was actually thinking about making Datum (and some other types we
> have) structs or unions. Currently it's far, far to easy to mix them. We throw
> away pretty much all of the little typesafety C has by typedef'ing them
> to integral types with lots of autocasting behaviour.
That's intentional; on many ABIs, making Datum a struct would be
catastrophic performance-wise because it would not be eligible for simple
register pass or return conventions. In any case, the number of bugs
I can remember that such a thing would've prevented is negligible.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-05 15:39:24 | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-12-05 15:26:51 | Re: shared memory message queues |