Re: Why is LOG level below WARNING and ERROR for log_min_error_statement?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kal Sze <swordangel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is LOG level below WARNING and ERROR for log_min_error_statement?
Date: 2015-06-05 05:27:31
Message-ID: 15881.1433482051@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Kal Sze <swordangel(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm trying to debug a problem that is occurring rather rarely, which
> causes multiple clients connected to the same postgresql 9.4 server to
> crash at the same time.

> These clients send *lots* of SQL statements. I want to turn on
> statement logging, but I am baffled by the fact that the LOG level is
> *below* WARNING and ERROR levels, for the `log_min_error_statement`
> configuration option. This results in my log being flooded with
> useless messages about statements that have succeeded.

> Why is it designed like that?

LOG level is meant for non-client-facing log messages, which should get
sent to the postmaster log even if log_min_messages has been set high
enough to suppress logging of everyday SQL-statement errors. On the other
hand, they're not meant for client consumption so they don't get sent to
the client at the default client_min_messages setting.

You didn't say exactly where the problematic messages are coming from,
but it sounds a bit like somebody on the client side misunderstood what
they should use LOG for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kal Sze 2015-06-05 05:58:53 Re: Why is LOG level below WARNING and ERROR for log_min_error_statement?
Previous Message Kal Sze 2015-06-05 05:15:33 Why is LOG level below WARNING and ERROR for log_min_error_statement?