Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?

From: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Date: 2002-12-05 14:23:41
Message-ID: 15855.24941.703682.418404@kelvin.csl.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > > Perhaps the .so name should have been updated for PostgreSQL 7.3?
> >
> > It should have been. If it wasn't, that was a serious oversight.
> > Not sure if we should change it in 7.3.1 or not, though; it may be
> > too late for that. Any thoughts out there?
> Seems I did forget. I always update the minor for a major release, but
> when development starts, and I seem to have forgotten for 7.3. Sorry.

Personally I think automatically updating the version numbers is as
bad as not doing it at all - it misses the point.

The version numbers in shared library filenames denote binary
compatibilty, if the /public/ API changes then the version number
really must be incremented.

If the version increments without any associated API changes then it's
just a PITA for developers and products linking to the PostgreSQL
libraries! It forces recompilation when there is not really a need.

Lee.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-12-05 14:31:11 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces
Previous Message Igor Georgiev 2002-12-05 13:42:10 Re: Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone? (postmaster windows shell)