Paul van der Linden <paul(dot)doskabouter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for the clarification, but giving up performance is a no-go for us.
> Also I have my concerns about shemaqualifying each and every use of the ->
> operator, there are really a lot of them in my functions and it would
> severely impact readability.
> Are these the only 2 solutions possible?
As of v14 you could use SQL-style function definitions, so that the
operator is parsed at function definition time instead of runtime.
regards, tom lane