Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql
Date: 2010-01-14 05:52:10
Message-ID: 15854.1263448330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is this patch reversed? It seems so but the listed file timestamps
>> don't match that idea ...

> Sorry, I cannot understand what you mean...

The patch looks like it removes, rather than adds, your intended
changes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-01-14 06:04:39 Re: [PATCH] remove redundant ownership checks
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-01-14 05:30:33 Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql