Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Date: 2011-01-26 15:31:34
Message-ID: 15853.1296055894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> The missing entry in pg_depend is the reason why the extension is not
> part of the dump. We could fix that using a LEFT JOIN here and COALESCE
> to force the namespace as pg_catalog. Is that not a kludge?

Yes, it is. Why is the pg_depend entry missing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 15:36:01 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove arbitrary ALTER TABLE .. ADD COLUMN restriction.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 15:27:57 Re: systable_getnext_ordered