Quick Links

Re: Patch queue concern

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc:	"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Patch queue concern
Date:	2007-03-29 05:34:04
Message-ID:	15850.1175146444@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> My feeling is we should have more regular sync points where the patch
> queue is emptied and everything committed or rejected.

No doubt, but the real problem here is that reviewing/committing other
people's patches is not fun, it's just work :-(. So it's no surprise
that it tends to get put off. Not sure what to do about that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: Patch queue concern at 2007-03-28 23:30:06 from Simon Riggs

Responses

Re: Patch queue concern at 2007-03-29 09:06:14 from Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
Re: Patch queue concern at 2007-03-29 10:03:14 from Simon Riggs
Re: Patch queue concern at 2007-03-29 11:37:02 from Gregory Stark
Re: Patch queue concern at 2007-03-29 17:40:13 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Koichi Suzuki	2007-03-29 08:50:03	Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update
Previous Message	Pavan Deolasee	2007-03-29 03:30:24	Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design