| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Date: | 2002-02-25 05:38:29 |
| Message-ID: | 15849.1014615509@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> AFAIK, no effort is made to ensure that dump files produced by a current
> version of pg_dump will restore properly into older databases.
No, but gratuitous breakage should be avoided --- especially when it's
in pursuit of a goal that no one except Bruce subscribes to in the
first place ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Janardhana Reddy | 2002-02-25 07:11:32 | Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-25 05:35:02 | Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Eggert | 2002-02-25 07:07:01 | support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-25 05:35:02 | Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements |