Re: Array initialisation notation in syscache.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Array initialisation notation in syscache.c
Date: 2022-12-21 19:45:13
Message-ID: 1583932.1671651913@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Wanted to ask this since I encountered a need for a cache with 5 keys -
> why is the syscache index still limited to 4 keys?

Because there are no cases requiring 5, so far.

(A unique index with as many as 5 keys seems a bit fishy btw.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2022-12-21 20:04:26 Re: Supporting MERGE on updatable views
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-12-21 19:44:11 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions (checkAsUser)