From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index usage problem on 8.3.3 |
Date: | 2008-10-31 01:55:58 |
Message-ID: | 15839.1225418158@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Any idea why I don't see it on 8.3.4?
>>
>> I think it's more likely some small difference in your test conditions
>> than any real version-to-version difference. In particular I think the
>> "still see" test might be influenced by the ages of transactions running
>> concurrently.
> Interesting. This is on a test server which has no other concurrent
> transactions and it acts the same way after I stopped 8.3.4 and started up
> 8.3.3 again as it did before stopping 8.3.3 to bring up 8.3.4. Hrmm..I'm not
> sure that makes sense. So, I did the test with the sql script on 8.3.3, then
> shut down 8.3.3, started up 8.3.4 on the same data dir, ran the test
> successfully. Next I shut down 8.3.4 and started 8.3.3 and verified that the
> behavior was still the same on 8.3.3. I wonder what else I might be doing
> differently.
Huh. That does sound like it's a version-to-version difference.
There's nothing in the CVS log that seems related though. Are you
willing to post your test case?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2008-10-31 02:47:25 | Re: Index usage problem on 8.3.3 |
Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2008-10-31 01:49:21 | Re: Index usage problem on 8.3.3 |