Re: What is faster?

From: "ON(dot)KG" <skyer(at)on(dot)kg>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is faster?
Date: 2005-06-06 17:02:13
Message-ID: 15836788703.20050606210213@on.kg
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi All!

>> What is faster - SLECTion data from one large table (200 000 - 300 000
>> records), or SELECTion from a few small tables (example, 2 tables 150
>> 000 records each)?

RH> It depends. Are you selecting all records? One record? A few records? If
RH> one or a few, do you have a suitable index on the table(s)? Is the table
RH> clustered? Expected to be cached in RAM?

RH> Do you have a specific problem, or reason to believe you may encounter one?

It's a real problem

For example i have two large tables
Structure of tables is same - has two fields - id, ip

Now i'm using two selection from each in one transaction
Each of them selects only one record
selection clase like WHERE ip = 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
so it is searches existance of IP in each table

tables are clustered

about cached in RAM - i'm novice in Postgresql - how does it work?

now i need to make much faster as it is possible
and have an idea just merge two tables in one - will it help me?

Thank You

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KÖPFERL Robert 2005-06-06 18:08:07 Re: SQL equivalent to nested loop
Previous Message Markus Bertheau ☭ 2005-06-06 16:52:31 SQL equivalent to nested loop