Re: pg_terminate_backend idea

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend idea
Date: 2005-06-24 21:36:10
Message-ID: 15833.1119648970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have been running some tests to try to see the lock table corruption
> but I have been unable to reproduce the problem.

It's possible that what Rod was complaining of is fixed in CVS tip ---
see discussion about RemoveFromWaitQueue() bug. If so, it would have
been a bug that could be seen in other circumstances too, but maybe
SIGTERM made it more probable for some reason.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-24 21:43:53 Re: pg_terminate_backend idea
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-24 21:15:38 Re: pg_terminate_backend idea