From: | Boris Köster <koester(at)x-itec(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Gunther Schadow <gunther(at)aurora(dot)regenstrief(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Mass-Data question |
Date: | 2002-04-16 09:13:19 |
Message-ID: | 1583278384.20020416111319@x-itec.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello Gunther,
Monday, April 15, 2002, 10:53:19 PM, you wrote:
GS> Boris Köster wrote:
GS> Hmm, interesting. I have similar needs. Let's hear what the gurus
GS> have to say. But asking independent of PostgreSQL, what do you want
GS> the RDBMS to do? You probably want a virtual shared disk storage,
GS> such as a RAID system to which you can connect multiple hosts. VMS
GS> clusters have that feature. The disks are independent of the hosts.
Yes, that sounds interesting as one option.
GS> But then of course it's non-trivial to use multiple server hosts on
GS> the same database storage. Oracle can do something like that (but
GS> you pay heavy $$$).
Hm yes.
GS> So, what is it you want the system to do? Parallelize a single query
GS> over multiple hosts? I wouldn't count on that being available with
GS> PostgreSQL any time soon.
I am collecting up to 6000-7000 informations in a timeline of 1-3
Secounds, that 24h a day, 365 days a year. The harddrives may not be
fast enough to collect the data, that´s really heavy. All these data
must be analyzed in realtime if required by the customer(s).
parallelized query is an interseting idea.
GS> -Gunther
--
Best regards,
Boris mailto:koester(at)x-itec(dot)de
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boris Köster | 2002-04-16 09:45:35 | Re: Mass-Data question |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-04-16 07:16:46 | Re: DataBlades |