Re: policies and extensions

From: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: policies and extensions
Date: 2020-02-18 23:26:17
Message-ID: 1582068377.18009.28.camel@bloodnok.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 15:06 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Policies, also being part of the overall privilege system, could
> certainly be looked at in a similar light as being different from
> triggers and indexes...

While I think I agree with Stephen here, I don't have a vested interest
in any particular solution and am not advocating for change.  

I am kinda surprised that policies are not explicitly tracked as part
of an extension but I can live with the status quo now that it has been
explained.  

I think it *may* be worth stating something explicitly in the
documentation but again I am not advocating.

Thanks again.

__
Marc

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-02-19 01:22:27 Re: How to handle CASE statement with PostgreSQL without need for typecasting
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-02-18 22:15:40 Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: pglogical install errors openSUSE Leap 42.1