From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Curtis Zinzilieta <curtisz(at)norchemlab(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>, Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs |
Date: | 2004-10-27 03:21:31 |
Message-ID: | 15812.1098847291@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Curtis Zinzilieta <curtisz(at)norchemlab(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Er ... it *is* the other way around. bi is blocks in (to the CPU),
>> bo is blocks out (from the CPU).
> Ummm.....
> [curtisz(at)labsoft T2]$ man vmstat
> bi: Blocks sent to a block device (blocks/s).
> bo: Blocks received from a block device (blocks/s).
You might want to have a word with your OS vendor. My vmstat
man page says
IO
bi: Blocks received from a block device (blocks/s).
bo: Blocks sent to a block device (blocks/s).
and certainly anyone who's been around a computer more than a week or
two knows which direction "in" and "out" are customarily seen from.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Meinel | 2004-10-27 04:18:09 | Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs |
Previous Message | Anjan Dave | 2004-10-27 03:12:20 | Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs |