Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Eric Ridge <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow?
Date: 2004-01-18 03:22:51
Message-ID: 1581.1074396171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Eric Ridge <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> writes:
> I've created a stub AM that literally does nothing.

It's not possible for an index AM to "do nothing", at least not for an
indexscan. It has to return tuple pointers. What are you doing for
that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2004-01-18 03:45:37 Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-18 03:18:36 Re: Bug in pg_autovacuum ?