Re: Using the %m printf format more

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using the %m printf format more
Date: 2024-03-13 13:33:52
Message-ID: 15807ada-c099-46bb-a073-bfc0a9357872@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.03.24 02:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:19:16AM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> On closer look, fprintf() is actually the only errno-clobbering function
>> it calls, I was just hedging my bets in that statement.
>
> This makes the whole simpler, so I'd be OK with that. I am wondering
> if others have opinions to offer about that.

The 0002 patch looks sensible. It would be good to fix that, otherwise
it could have some confusing outcomes in the future.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-03-13 13:34:15 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-03-13 13:27:27 Re: Disabling Heap-Only Tuples