| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ignore tablespace ACLs when ignoring schema ACLs |
| Date: | 2017-02-05 18:48:09 |
| Message-ID: | 15798.1486320489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 12:46:41PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is there any likely use-case for providing separate control flags for the
>> two permission checks? That would require an API change for DefineIndex,
>> making this considerably more invasive, so I'm not pushing for it ---
>> just think it's worth asking the question before proceeding.
> Good question. I can't think of one.
Yeah, after some reflection I agree. Basically what we want for the ALTER
TABLE scenario is "ignore *all* permissions checks"; if somebody adds some
other check here in future, it probably also ought to be skipped during
a rebuild. So a single bool ought to be fine.
Are you intending to back-patch this? It seems like a bug fix --- but not
a very high-priority one, so at this point maybe it should wait till after
the release wraps.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2017-02-05 18:56:03 | Re: Ignore tablespace ACLs when ignoring schema ACLs |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2017-02-05 18:38:35 | Re: Ignore tablespace ACLs when ignoring schema ACLs |