From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: last_statrequest is in the future |
Date: | 2010-03-26 17:17:57 |
Message-ID: | 15797.1269623877@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Even if there was something to be done in kernel space, how many years
> from now would it be before it made this problem go away for the
> majority of near future 9.0 users? We've been seeing a fairly regular
> stream of "pgstat wait timeout" reports come in. The one I reported was
> from recent hardware and a very mainstream Linux setup.
The behavior I'm seeing in jaguar's reports is difficult to characterize
as anything except a seriously broken machine (see the followup message
with further details). It may be that there is some
not-obviously-broken-hardware case that we need to deal with, but I have
not seen evidence of it yet. Can you reproduce your test case with CVS
HEAD and send the log messages?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-26 18:53:24 | Re: TODO list updates |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-03-26 17:05:37 | Re: last_statrequest is in the future |