From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solving the OID-collision problem |
Date: | 2005-08-04 14:55:21 |
Message-ID: | 15797.1123167321@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>> 2. Performance. Doing this would require widening Datum to 64 bits,
>> which is a system-wide performance hit on 32-bit machines.
> Do you really think it would make a measurable difference, more so than
> your proposed solution? (I'm skeptical it would be measurable at all)
I'm too lazy to run an experiment, but I believe it would. Datum is
involved in almost every function-call API in the backend. In
particular this means that it would affect performance-critical code
paths. Creation of tables and such isn't performance-critical in most
applications, so a few percent overhead there doesn't bother me. A few
percent across the board is another story.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-04 15:12:58 | Re: Enhanced containment selectivity function |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-04 14:46:24 | Re: prevent encoding conversion recursive error |