Re: ProcessUtility_hook

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Date: 2009-12-01 01:38:18
Message-ID: 15794.1259631498@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we?

> Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=196
> and the author replied. Is there more that needs to be done?

It wasn't marked Ready For Committer, so presumably the reviewer
wasn't done with it. I know I hadn't looked at it at all, because
I was waiting for the commitfest review process to finish.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-12-01 01:55:38 Re: ProcessUtility_hook
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-12-01 01:35:27 Re: ProcessUtility_hook