| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "Immediate shutdown if postmaster.pid is removed" not mentioned in Release Notes |
| Date: | 2015-12-16 22:42:11 |
| Message-ID: | 15792.1450305731@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I noticed, that 9.5 release notes (beta2) do not mention
> commit 7e2a18a9161fee7e67642863f72b51d77d3e996.
We don't normally document back-patched patches in as-yet-unreleased
branches, since the point of release notes is to tell you what's new
compared to the previous release, and this item isn't (or won't be).
Also, I doubt that this is of any great concern to the average user.
It's not a scenario that would come up in anything I would call a
supported use-case. If we're to reverse the aforementioned policy,
there are probably quite a few patches that would now need to be
documented as "new in 9.5" and are more significant than this.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-12-16 23:08:05 | Re: "Immediate shutdown if postmaster.pid is removed" not mentioned in Release Notes |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2015-12-16 22:32:36 | Re: "Immediate shutdown if postmaster.pid is removed" not mentioned in Release Notes |