Re: sqlca warning (was Re: IFNULL -> COALESCE)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sqlca warning (was Re: IFNULL -> COALESCE)
Date: 2002-02-11 21:58:56
Message-ID: 15786.1013464736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> As it stands, sqlca will actually be included twice, so the warning has
> some merit. But it might be better to actually prevent the second
> inclusion.

Why? sqlca.h has an #ifndef guard, so there's no harm done. I'd vote
for just suppressing the check and notice completely.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-11 22:42:55 Re: GiST on 64-bit box
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-02-11 21:56:00 sqlca warning (was Re: IFNULL -> COALESCE)