| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode upper() bug still present |
| Date: | 2003-10-20 21:15:41 |
| Message-ID: | 15779.1066684541@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I agree that depending on the system-provided locale behavior has its
>> downsides, but it has its upsides too;
> I like to think that in the end we can do much better than the POSIX
> framework can do.
Sure, we can make it work exactly the way we want. I'm just wondering
whether the benefits are worth the significant expenditure of effort...
But if you want to do the work, I won't hold you back.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-20 21:31:14 | Re: Vacuum thoughts |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-20 20:58:00 | Re: Unicode upper() bug still present |