Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Date: 2014-03-05 17:37:30
Message-ID: 15760.1394041050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we really need a larger consensus on this though, so I'd be
> interested to hear what others think.

My advice is to lose the EXPLAIN output entirely. If the authors of
the patch can't agree on what it means, what hope have everyday users
got of making sense of it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-03-05 17:38:57 Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-03-05 17:36:24 Re: jsonb and nested hstore