Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID
Date: 2023-04-04 17:34:22
Message-ID: 1575054.1680629662@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> út 4. 4. 2023 v 16:20 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>> If we do that, then the confusion you were concerned about upthread
>> goes away and we could shorten the keyword back down to "pg_routine_oid",
>> which seems like a good thing for our carpal tunnels.

> has sense

OK, pushed like that with some cosmetic adjustments (better test
case, mostly).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-04-04 17:37:46 Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-04-04 17:29:10 Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command