Re: comma vs cross join question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mailing(dot)lists(at)octgsoftware(dot)com
Cc: pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: comma vs cross join question
Date: 2011-04-08 18:24:10
Message-ID: 15744.1302287050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jason Long <mailing(dot)lists(at)octgsoftware(dot)com> writes:
> I recently upgraded to JBoss AS 6.0.0.Final which includes a newer
> version of Hibernate.
> Previously the Postgres dialect was using a comma, but now is is using
> cross join.
> With the cross join this query never completes. With the comma the
> query is identical to what was there before and takes less than 300 ms.

Those should be semantically equivalent AFAICS. Do you maybe have
join_collapse_limit set to a smaller-than-default value? If not, are
any of those tables really join views?

Please see
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
if you need further help, because there's not enough information here
to do more than guess wildly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-08 18:39:52 Re: PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-08 18:08:52 Re: Changed SSL Certificates