From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mingw configure failure detection |
Date: | 2004-05-10 07:17:46 |
Message-ID: | 1574.24.211.141.25.1084173466.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
I said:
> Peter Eisentraut said:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> This patch for configure.in detects the link failures in MINGW that I
>>> and others have seen and warns the user they have to fix it up.
>>
>> I continue to object to these sort of patches if no one wants to
>> bother
>> to contact the mingw maintainers about this problem. Maybe they have
>> a better fix available?
>>
>
> I have already said I would follow it up. But the problem exists today
> and shouldn't be left until we get an answer. Maybe it will take a week
> or a month, or there will be no good answer at all.
>
It appears that Dann Corbit has filed a MinGW bug on this, with accurate
problem description, but he received a less than stellar response. See
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=931263&group_id=2435&atid=102435
(Despite previous speculation, he did indicate that the problem is
intermittent, not constant).
Cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-05-10 08:01:52 | CLUSTER locking |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-05-10 07:11:50 | Re: Comments on all system objects |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-05-10 08:07:19 | Re: Postmaster service code |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-10 04:19:03 | Re: JDBC problem/question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-10 14:21:53 | Re: mingw configure failure detection |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-05-09 21:19:09 | Configuration parameters for plugin modules |