From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all) |
Date: | 2009-09-29 20:53:22 |
Message-ID: | 1574.1254257602@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> 2009/9/29 Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>:
>> To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
>> suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +0000, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I write
>> this; it has yet to appear. This isn't an isolated case; I regularly refer
>> IRC users with bug reports to the reporting form, and I estimate that more
>> than one-third of those reports never show up.
> They get processed in the moderator queue of -bugs along with all
> other posts there... We're probably just back in the situation where
> we need more moderators for it...
A quick grep in my mail logs shows that since Jan 1, I have received 440
bug-reporter emails, bearing numbers from 4598 to 5087 (a range of 490
numbers). So Andrew's "one-third" is a large exaggeration, but we do
seem to be dropping about one-tenth of the traffic. I suppose some part
of what gets submitted is spam that the moderators rightfully reject;
would anyone who's seen the raw data care to comment on whether 10%
sounds right?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-09-29 21:40:37 | Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all) |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-09-29 20:44:01 | Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all) |