| From: | Arndt Lehmann <arndt(dot)lehmann(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Table replication |
| Date: | 2009-07-09 16:12:42 |
| Message-ID: | 157360e5-6f51-4923-87f5-a1431c90f192@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jul 9, 7:53 pm, d(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)archonet(dot)com (Richard Huxton) wrote:
> S Arvind wrote:
> > Hi Members,
> > Is there any way to sync a single table across the DBs. We need a single
> > table alone to be equal in all DBs in the single postgres. Presenly we are
> > doing this with the help of Update, insert, delete trigger.
> > Is there any other best way for that.
>
> Most trigger-based replication systems should work fine with one or more
> tables: slony, londiste etc. That's assuming a single master DB that
> receives all updates.
>
> --
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
And tools like bucardo or rubyrep can do this in a master-master
replication.
Regards,
Arndt Lehmann
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2009-07-09 17:25:15 | is autovacuum recommended? |
| Previous Message | Dan Armbrust | 2009-07-09 16:03:00 | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question |