Re: UTF-8 question.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Richard Connamacher" <rich(dot)n1(at)indieimage(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF-8 question.
Date: 2004-09-17 03:23:33
Message-ID: 15728.1095391413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Richard Connamacher" <rich(dot)n1(at)indieimage(dot)com> writes:
> 7.1 may be prehistoric, but it's running on an off-site server that I'm
> renting, and this version came pre-installed. Since it's already there
> and working, I'd like to get familiar with it before I try to reinstall
> a newer version. I doubt I'd know what to do with many of the newer
> features anyway,

It's not so much "more features" as "fewer bugs". There are known data
loss problems in 7.1.* and before (transaction ID wraparound, for
instance, though you might call that a design shortcoming rather than
a bug per se).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hadley Willan 2004-09-17 04:43:23 Is it possible to get the 7.4.1 static docs in HTML form anymore?
Previous Message Richard Connamacher 2004-09-17 02:06:32 Re: UTF-8 question.