Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've applied some of the changes you suggested in your previous email
> and pushed the updated patch. Thank you for your review.
The buildfarm's not too happy. It looks like this patch decided
to use the name "distinct_tbl" in a test script that runs in
parallel with another one already using "distinct_tbl".
regards, tom lane