From: | "Ghiurea, Isabella" <Isabella(dot)Ghiurea(at)nrc-cnrc(dot)gc(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour. |
Date: | 2019-10-22 16:07:58 |
Message-ID: | 1571760478930.76745@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for suggestion, yes we tested without Pgsphere index ( dropped the index) in PGSQL 10.9 , run same SQL and got the expected result which is same as the one in PG 9.5 but different f when using the PG sphere in 10.9( which returned null rows),
explain SELECT count(*), min(degrees(long(pos))), max(degrees(long(pos))), min(degrees(lat(pos))), max(degrees(lat(pos)))
FROM XXX.DR1
WHERE pos <@ spoly '{(189.1d,30.9d),(192.1d,30.9d),(192.1d,33.9d),(189.1d,33.9d)}';
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=13576821.96..13576821.97 rows=1 width=40)
-> Seq Scan on DR1 (cost=0.00..13563681.20 rows=404331 width=16)
Filter: (pos <@ '{(3.30041761552128 , 0.539306738866248),(3.35277749308111 , 0.539306738866248),(3.35277749308111 , 0.59166
6616426078),(3.30041761552128 , 0.591666616426078)}'::spoly)
________________________________
From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 3:20 PM
To: Ghiurea, Isabella
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:09 PM Ghiurea, Isabella <Isabella(dot)Ghiurea(at)nrc-cnrc(dot)gc(dot)ca<mailto:Isabella(dot)Ghiurea(at)nrc-cnrc(dot)gc(dot)ca>> wrote:
In PG 9,5.16 we are seeing the correct/expecting number of rows returned BUT in in PG 10.9 we are seeing returns 0 rows.
If you disable the index (`set enable_bitmapscan=off` should do that) do you get the same answer on each server?
Cheer,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-10-22 16:27:52 | Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour. |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-10-21 22:20:13 | Re: PGSQL 10.9 vs PGSQL 9.6 SQL query behaviour. |