From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fran Fabrizio <ffabrizio(at)mmrd(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: storing intermediate results in recursive plpgsql functions |
Date: | 2002-03-05 15:53:09 |
Message-ID: | 15708.1015343589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Fran Fabrizio <ffabrizio(at)mmrd(dot)com> writes:
> If that's the case, then this is the second time in a week I've found
> huge errors in this darn PostgreSQL Developer's Handbook I bought. I'm
> coming very close to tossing this thing in the garbage.
> "When a PL/pgSQL function locks a table, the lock is released when the
> PL/pgSQL function returns".
This is bogus...
> "You can't have transactions in PL/pgSQL functions. Every function is
> executed in one transaction."
This is perfectly true: the transaction in which the calling query is
contained also contains the operations executed in the called function.
However, evidently the context misled you to think it meant that the
function has its own transaction.
> This book is really starting to tick me off. Grr. I'm amazed that
> there are errors of this magnitude. The authors are Ewald Geschwinde
> and Hans-Jurgen Schonig, does anyone know their credentials?
Can't say that I recognize either name. But you might as well let them
know of the mistakes you find, so that they can fix 'em in future
editions (if any).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-05 15:56:56 | Re: vacuum statistics |
Previous Message | Ashley Clark | 2002-03-05 15:49:28 | Re: PL/pgSQL Syntax Problem |