Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Date: 2010-09-26 19:27:41
Message-ID: 15701.1285529261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ? It's not hard to offer an option for that, I guess, but I foresee an
>> argument about what the default is going to be.

> If there's no clear consensus, I'm OK with the time-honored tie-break
> of "he who does the work...".

How about

Usage: git_changelog [--post-date/-p] [--since=SINCE]
--post-date Show branches made after a commit occurred
--since Print only commits dated since SINCE

? Got a better name for it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2010-09-26 19:45:28 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 19:24:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2010-09-26 19:45:28 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 19:24:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.