Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Date: 2015-05-19 18:51:31
Message-ID: 156e0a392ef98cd16a3cc19bc29e0004@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Dave Cramer opined:
> It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not
> convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5 years
> they should be all but gone

Ha ha ha ha ha! That's a good one. We still have clients on Postgres 7!
Five years is way too short to replace something that major.

> Agreed a patch would be the first place to start

That, or just running the idea up the flagpole on -general. I'm a fairly
strong -1 at the moment, but will listen to arguments.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201505191448
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlVbhfcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsguxwCgrMPQKa9tTfMcuv4jRnqM6mNg
OvAAmgLNpa2vsiv+bkd7p4bUEx7op9ax
=sr9j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Blackwell 2015-05-19 18:51:58 Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-19 18:46:15 Re: RFC: Non-user-resettable SET SESSION AUTHORISATION