| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
| Date: | 2015-05-19 18:51:31 |
| Message-ID: | 156e0a392ef98cd16a3cc19bc29e0004@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dave Cramer opined:
> It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not
> convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5 years
> they should be all but gone
Ha ha ha ha ha! That's a good one. We still have clients on Postgres 7!
Five years is way too short to replace something that major.
> Agreed a patch would be the first place to start
That, or just running the idea up the flagpole on -general. I'm a fairly
strong -1 at the moment, but will listen to arguments.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201505191448
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlVbhfcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsguxwCgrMPQKa9tTfMcuv4jRnqM6mNg
OvAAmgLNpa2vsiv+bkd7p4bUEx7op9ax
=sr9j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Blackwell | 2015-05-19 18:51:58 | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-19 18:46:15 | Re: RFC: Non-user-resettable SET SESSION AUTHORISATION |