From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: add argument type to postgres_fdw docs |
Date: | 2021-06-16 04:24:49 |
Message-ID: | 156cf639-c6ed-6f0e-a062-db4b72851483@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2021/06/16 12:39, Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I add argument type to postgres-fdw parameters in postgres-fdw.sgml.
> I think this change is kind. Do you think?
I think this change would improve the postgres_fdw docs.
- <term><literal>extensions</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>extensions</literal> (<type>enum</type>)</term>
Since each value in "extensions" parameter is not limitted like
shared_preload_libraries, its type should be "string"?
- <term><literal>fdw_startup_cost</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>fdw_startup_cost</literal> (<type>double precision</type>)</term>
- <term><literal>fdw_tuple_cost</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>fdw_tuple_cost</literal> (<type>double precision</type>)</term>
Since "floating point" is used for GUC docs, "floating point" should be
used for the sake of consistenty, instead?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shinya11.Kato | 2021-06-16 05:13:41 | RE: add argument type to postgres_fdw docs |
Previous Message | Shinya11.Kato | 2021-06-16 03:39:40 | add argument type to postgres_fdw docs |